Naked Capitalism (Yves Smith) had a great post explaining why Paul Krugman is wrong that US housing will recover.
Click here.
Groovygirl often quotes Martin Armstrong’s real estate cycle that is in a 26-year decline that started in 2007. We may have a slight uptick between 2012-2015, but gg will contribute that to government and banking regulations that “hide” the real inventory of housing (i.e. foreclosures).
Although Ms. Smith makes great arguments for the continued fall in housing, she misses one of the main reasons that US housing is and will continue to fall. The US housing market system is built on bank lending. No mortgages, no buying and selling and building. (And the US government can step in with only so much lending power for real estate, they already have more than they can handle with the Housing Authority and Freddie-Fannie.)
If you haven’t received the memo, the US banking system has not fixed its debt problems. It is not lending money. Nor, will it lend money as it did before 2007 with 10% down and a 30-year fixed rate at 5%, even if the economy should turn around. Which it won’t.
When the banking industry does decide to lend money again for housing and they should find an employed person with no foreclosure history, they will demand 50% down and a fixed 15-year rate of 10% plus. Should Americans decide they want to own a house under those conditions, they will need several years to save the 50% down.
Thus, it will be 2032, according to Martin Armstrong until we hit a low in US housing.
Side musing: If you own an investment property and you sell at a loss, you may take the loss against your income tax. In some cases, over a period of years. But if the sell is your residence, sorry, no loss to carry through.
In addition, a short sale on a residence can mean extra taxes. Current tax and investment laws make real estate investing, not home ownership, the better option during a long term down-trend in housing. Before making an investment in anything, know the current long-term cycle you are in. This basic understanding is the difference between profit and loss.
If tax laws change, this conclusion could change.
Chart of the day illustrates the real decline in housing. Click here.